Editorial: Poway shooting presents another instance of nationwide gun control reform failure

Every time, it’s too close to home.

Until it is your home.

Last week, it was UCLA’s turn – yet again.

A gunman opened fire April 28 in a Poway, California, synagogue during its final Passover celebrations. Two men and an 8-year-old girl were wounded. One woman, Lori Gilbert-Kaye, was killed when she jumped in front of the synagogue’s rabbi, saving his life.

Kaye was a UCLA alumna. Her daughter is also a Bruin.

The cynicism is palpable. This nation has become numb to the notion of mass shootings, with hundreds killed and injured in Las Vegas, Orlando, Pittsburgh and Parkland. Politicians – from state senators up to the U.S. president – have been adamant that gun control efforts equate to attacks on the Second Amendment. The result has been a national legislative stagnation at the cost of public safety.

States like California have trodden forward with statewide reform efforts, such as banning assault weapons, restricting the number of long guns people can purchase within a month and passing ballot propositions requiring background checks for ammunition purchases.

But the excruciatingly painful truth is that no amount of state legislation will keep American citizens safe from gun violence. People will continue to purchase firearms in states with lax regulations or with National Rifle Association-pocketed elected representatives, and we’ll only see more iterations of Poway.

UCLA knows this all too well. Thousands of Bruins graduating this year live with the scars of the June 1, 2016, shooting, when a gunman drove from Minnesota with two pistols and ammunition, stormed into the Engineering IV building and killed William Klug, an associate professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering.

The man who murdered 58 people at the Route 91 Harvest festival in Las Vegas in 2017 spent decades legally purchasing firearms from Utah, Nevada, Texas and even California before he sprayed bullets on hundreds of concertgoers – some of whom were UCLA students and alumni.

The man who killed 17 students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, in 2018 obtained his rifle legally, according to state officials.

The man who killed 49 at an Orlando, Florida, nightclub in 2016 purchased his handgun and semi-automatic legally.

The man who killed 11 at the Pittsburgh Tree of Life synagogue in October bought his assault rifle legally.

The man who opened fire last week in Poway bought his gun legally, potentially in another state.

Any sensible nation would feel shame in the face of these truths.

But while mass shootings have become a mainstay in our culture, they’re not inevitable. They’re instigated by outdated, misinformed and big money-infused laws – and the elected officials who perpetuate senseless norms.

Poway didn’t result from a collective moral failure. It came from the failures of individuals intent on committing violence. It came from the failure of national leaders to realize the danger of easy access to firearms. It came from the failure of legislators to pass reforms banning military-grade equipment from everyday commerce. It came from the failure of all 50 U.S. states to collectively agree that gun violence isn’t an acceptable norm.

The cynicism and sorrow are apt. But we know who to blame.

Green Screens film festival aims to educate UCLA community on environmental issues

Cultured meat, or meat grown in a lab using animal cells, is an up-and-coming sustainable alternative to products of the traditional meat industry, said Paul Kurek.

A film detailing the necessity for new meat options will be screened Monday as a part of the Green Screens Sustainability Film Festival.

Kurek, a graduate student in the department of Germanic languages, said the festival’s aim is to spread the word about such sustainable developments. The Green Screens film festival is hosted by the Sustainable Resource Center and Melnitz Movies, a campus organization that hosts screenings, premieres and other film events for students. Taking place each evening from Monday to Thursday, the festival will comprise movies featuring different aspects of environmental consciousness screened at the James Bridges Theater. Kurek, the director of Melnitz Movies, said the films cover a wide array of pressing issues to remind attendees how their actions influence the world.

“By addressing the big environmental question and putting it on the screen and exposing students to it, we’d ideally like to see that everybody realizes humanity as a whole has one big footprint,” Kurek said. “We live (on) this campus and (in the) Westwood bubble, … and we’re unaware of how much of an impact the shoes we wear or the food we put on our table has.”

[RELATED: Coastalong to engage wider community as it cycles, recycles for its 7th year]

One of the screenings Kurek personally arranged is that of “Humboldt in Mexico” on Wednesday, which will be followed by a Q&A with director Ana Cruz. The film’s historical approach to revisiting German explorer Alexander von Humboldt led Kurek to want to feature it, he said. It essentially employs a dual perspective to view Humboldt as a celebrated environmentalist and explorer, but also as a colonizer who invaded the land – something Kurek said the movie discusses critically.

Along with “Humboldt,” the festival will also screen “Cowspiracy,” which tackles the meat industry, and “The Last Animals,” which examines ivory poaching and the dwindling population of African rhinos and elephants. Kyle Alves, a second-year environmental science student and one of the festival organizers, said he is looking forward to watching the “The Age of Consequences” on Tuesday. The film explores environmental issues in a new light he said, discussing how national security will be influenced by global warming.

“In so many ways, what climate change will be instigating with increased drought and increased natural disasters is a huge flux in immigration and in destabilizing nations around the world. (‘Age of Consequences’) will be a great explanation of everything that comes with climate change.”

Learning about the state of the environment can often be difficult and misleading, Alves said. When scrolling through his YouTube feed, he has seen clips of videos that sensationalize and sometimes exaggerate the state of the environment, with some people prophesying the end of the world due to humanity’s inability to take care of it. Such images can desensitize people and lessen the likelihood they will investigate the reality of the environment, he said.

The festival provides a safe and informative space where students can learn about environmental issues in an organized and educational manner, Alves said. This is a better alternative to being inundated with misinformation on the internet, he said, because students will be provided with facts and can engage in a dialogue with filmmakers and other audience members during Q&As after certain screenings.

“When it’s in a movie (screening) setting with others and you’re being led via story through the documentary, the information isn’t being thrown at you,” he said. “Rather it is guiding you through what may come and getting your head wrapped around the idea, rather than ‘Everything is going to hell.’”

[RELATED: New ways of seeing the sea: Installations invoke emotions of environmental change]

Last year, Kurek said about 50 students attended the film festival each night. He has noticed students will line up for popular celebrity movies – citing Melnitz Movies’ screening of Seth Rogen’s new film “Long Shot” on Thursday – but when it comes to movies with more of an educational stance, students typically aren’t as interested, he said.

This is something both Alves and Jenn Doyle, a graduate student of urban and regional planning and festival organizer, are aware of. To combat this, Doyle said they are using a rigorous Facebook campaign and highlighting that there will be free food before every screening as an incentive to get more students to attend.

Ultimately, Alves said he wants students to walk away from the festival driven to engage more with the environment, even if just in small ways like voting for sustainable measures or composting. Doyle, on the other hand, said that she knows not everyone may take action after watching the films. Her goal, however, is to have many students, faculty and community members attend so they can learn something new, even if they may disagree with the content.

“The more people who come, the more will learn and broaden their awareness of these issues, … and people who have a different perspective can learn about the other side,” she said. “Whether they do something about it or not, at least they can go out into the realm with this knowledge that they may have not had before.”

Women’s tennis’ sweep of LSU showcases high energy, sets mood for next round

The Bruins notched two sweeps to advance to the third round of the NCAA tournament.

No. 7 seed UCLA women’s tennis (20-7, 8-2 Pac-12) recorded a 4-0 sweep over LSU (17-12, 5-8 SEC) at the Los Angeles Tennis Center on Sunday. After losing to Stanford in the Pac-12 Championship final, the Bruins have since put together back-to-back sweeps to open up their NCAA Tournament campaign.

Freshman Elysia Bolton and redshirt junior Jada Hart carded a 6-4 win while sophomore Abi Altick and freshman Taylor Johnson won on court No. 3 to give UCLA an early 1-0 lead.

“LSU is a very tough and loud team,” Hart said. “So we had to amp up our energy to be successful today.”

Senior Gabby Andrews went on to defeat LSU’s Luba Vasilyuk in straight sets 6-2, 6-0, giving UCLA a 2-0 lead.

“I just tried to carry the momentum from doubles because I knew (Vasilyuk) was a tough player,” Andrews said. “I knew she was really confident in her singles game so I just tried to get my energy up.”

Bolton earned her win for UCLA with a 6-2, 6-3 defeat of LSU’s Jessica Golovin. Her victory left the visitors in a 3-0 deficit.

“You can tell that Elysia loves this. She loves being in these big matchups,” said coach Stella Sampras Webster. “That’s just how she is. Every match she plays, she plays hard so she can enjoy being in the moment.”

Hart earned a 6-4, 6-4 victory over LSU’s Eden Richardson. Hart’s performance clinched the match to send UCLA through to the third round of the NCAA tournament.

“It’s good to solidify the win quickly, so everyone can get their rest and get their bodies recovered for Friday,” Hart said. “It’s good that we’re on and off the court to recover faster.”

The Bruins will spend some time off before returning to the Los Angeles Tennis Center on Friday to take on No. 10 seed Washington. The match will mark the third time the Bruins have met with the Huskies this season.

“There’s going to be a lot of energy and a lot of emotions in the match,” Sampras Webster said. “It’s going to really come down to who can handle the moment the best.”

Photo: Relay For Life of UCLA raises awareness, funds for those affected by cancer

UCLA’s annual Relay For Life took place from noon Saturday to noon Sunday. Hosted by the American Cancer Society, the fundraising event aims to support those who have cancer and to remember those who have died from cancer. During the 24 hours, participants can take part in various activities including the lighting of lanterns. As of Sunday night, the event raised $260,737 of its $250,000 goal.

‘Booksmart’ screening, Q&A with Olivia Wilde opens up dialogue on female friendship

The night before graduation turns into two best friends’ quest to attend their first –and last –high school party in Olivia Wilde’s directorial debut, “Booksmart.”

Bruin Film Society hosted a screening of the upcoming film at the James Bridges Theater on Saturday evening, followed by a Q&A with Wilde and writer Katie Silberman. The event marks the kickoff of BFS’s Women in Entertainment Summit, which strives to promote stories written and directed by women filmmakers, said BFS social media coordinator and second-year communication student Samantha Wolf.

“We think it’s really important to highlight these women and their accomplishments because they’ve been given this platform to tell a really unique kind of female-driven stories,” Wolf said. “It’s especially exciting bringing this (film) about two girls in high school to a community of young people who’re really into comedies.”

[RELATED: Underrepresented Spanish-speaking women share perspectives in film festival]

The story, “Booksmart,” follows studious friends Molly and Amy who were so caught up striving to get into Ivy League universities that they never had quintessential high school experiences, like going to house parties. Once they learn that their classmates also got into top schools while balancing active social lives, they decide to make their last night of high school memorable by attending the class vice president’s graduation party.

In an introduction before the film, Wilde said the movie is a love letter to the current generation – who she said is cooler and more progressive than hers. She told the audience the film also has references to ’80s and ’90s teen comedies such as “The Breakfast Club,” “Fast Times at Ridgemont High” and “Clueless.” She said the crux of “Booksmart,” however, is to dismantle labels and asks viewers to acknowledge that people are multifaceted and deserve to be seen for who they truly are.

“We wanted to go deep right into the core of those existential crises that make adolescence really complicated, confusing and hard, but also really exciting,” Wilde said. “And to stop putting people into categories because if you’re doing that to others, then you’re doing it to yourself, and you’re just holding yourself back.”

Silberman echoed this sentiment later in the Q&A and said the script intentionally portrayed the leads as incredibly smart, but wanted to focus on their other personality traits too; This is evident in how Amy views Molly not only as the smart class valedictorian, but also as her funny and adventurous friend. Silberman said this depiction differs from most films, which more often than not portray “strong” and “smart” women as one-dimensional and flat, something she felt contradicted her real life experiences.

“In a lot of stories, if there’s a smart girl, you know, she’s smart, and you don’t know very much else about her,” Silberman said. “But the really smart women in my life are also very irresponsible, wild and funny, and they just happen to be doing these incredible things as well, like being doctors.”

Along with depicting the leads as strong women, the narrative also emphasizes the pair’s close bond. However, toward the end of the film there is a scene depicting cracks in their friendship, revealing pent up resentment the two have toward each other. Wilde said she wanted to capture how women are often easily able to express their admiration for one another but feel guilty when revealing negative emotions. When discussing the fight scene, she said it uncovers the characters’ anxieties about their diverging futures.

[RELATED: Panel of women in entertainment discusses Hollywood’s lasting inequities]

Portraying such genuine experiences – like that of best friends facing growing pains – was important to Wilde. She said she constantly asked the cast to let her know if certain dialogue felt stiff or awkward, and welcomed improvisation. Citing a specific example, she said the character Ryan, a cool skater girl, was played not by an actor, but by professional skater Victoria Ruesga.

Wilde said she chose Ruesga for the role because the others who auditioned for the part did not feel real. For example, even though skating is essential to the character, she could tell actresses coming in for the audition had never held a skateboard before. Ruesga wore her own clothes, like Adidas tracksuits, and even made adjustments to her lines, which Wilde said she encouraged the rest of the actors to do as well because it made the character dynamics more natural.

Throughout the story, Molly and Amy face obstacles in their friendship, while also exploring new relationships with others, a sign of their newfound independence as high school graduates. Wilde said one of her goals while creating the film was to depict the messy, complicated and ever-evolving dynamic between friends.

“Society gives us no movies or love songs to deal with friendships and how difficult they are. There’s no song to deal with a friend breakup,” Wilde said. “But honestly, these (female) friendships are powerful in a way that romantic relationships aren’t.”

Toward the end of the Q&A, a student who said she identifies as queer said she appreciated the portrayal of Amy’s parents for their acceptance of their daughter’s sexuality. This sentiment was also echoed by moderator Andrea Mandell, who said the diverse cast members were never shamed or judged for their gender and sexuality. Silberman said she hopes this aspect of the movie proves that comedies can be funny, and also kind, something Wilde said was intentional in their vision for “Booksmart.”

“You come to realize that there are no bad guys in life, there’s no villains,” Wilde said. “We wanted to take this structure that people think they understand and flip it on its back and say, ‘But what if everyone actually turned out to be really kind and smart? What does that do to how you organize society, and how you think of yourself?’”