UC pledges increased worker pay, prohibits strikes in tentative UPTE contract

University of California promised increased pay for a labor union and called for an end to strikes for the duration of the contract in a tentative five-year deal Tuesday.

University Professional and Technical Employees-Communications Workers of America 9119, a union that represents about 14,000 research and technical workers in the UC, will vote to ratify the new deal with the University in the next few weeks, according to a University press release.

UPTE members would be barred from striking for the five-year duration of the agreement.

The new deal includes separate terms for healthcare professionals and research and technical workers for pay, proposing a 20% increase in pay over five years for healthcare professionals and a 22% increase for research and technical professionals.

There will also be step pay increases for research and technical professionals in 2022 and 2024 which will be based on performance.

In addition, healthcare professionals will receive an equity pay increase. Equity pay addresses salary inequity that exists when an employee’s salary is significantly below others with similar performance and experience, according to the UC Berkeley Human Resources website.

The agreement will last until fall 2024 if passed.

Court suspends Heaps’ medical license for duration of criminal sexual assault case

The Los Angeles Superior Court suspended former UCLA obstetrician-gynecologist James Heaps’ medical license in a court hearing July 30.

The interim suspension against Heaps will last for the duration of the criminal sexual assault case against him.

Heaps faces two counts of sexual battery and one count of sexual exploitation by a physician in a criminal case involving two former patients Heaps treated in 2017 and 2018. At least 10 civil suits accusing Heaps of sexual assault have been filed since the criminal suit, three of which were filed this week, said Darren Kavinoky, an attorney for several alleged victims involved in the civil suits. Heaps denies all charges.

Deputy Attorney General Brian Roberts filed the request to suspend Heaps’ medical license on behalf of the Medical Board of California in late June during the first hearing for the sexual battery allegations against Heaps.

“(The) Defendant, if allowed to act as a physician and surgeon without restriction during the pendency of these proceedings, poses a potential danger to the public, ” Roberts wrote on behalf of the board in the request dated June 25.

The request comes over a year after the UCLA Title IX investigation into Heaps’ practice concluded Heaps violated university policies on sexual violence and harassment by retaliating against a person involved in the investigation.

The investigation also shows that allegations against Heaps stretch back to 2014, but the university deferred the decision on whether Heaps sexually harassed or abused a patient to its Medical Staff. The university later filed a formal complaint with the Medical Board of California.

Tracy Green, an attorney for Heaps, said since Heaps has retired, he does not actively practice medicine anymore, so the license suspension is redundant. However, Green said given the ongoing litigation surrounding Heaps, she does not want him to see any patients for now.

“That way, no one can say, ‘Well, he could go practice,’” Green said. “There should be no concern. He hasn’t been practicing the last year either.”

Kavinoky said he was grateful for the attorney general’s office’s help in suspending Heaps’ license.

“If only UCLA were to have acted this promptly, women would have been spared,” Kavinoky said. “It’s clear UCLA knew or should have known there was a problem long before they actually acted.”

Heaps announced his retirement last year after the university informed him that it would not renew his contract in June 2018. Heaps’ license expires at the end of October regardless of the suspension, but Green did not specify whether Heaps would renew it.

“It is not an admission of any wrongdoing whatsoever,” Leonard Levine, an attorney representing Heaps, said about the decision. Levine also represented George Tyndall, the former USC gynecologist who was ordered to pay $215 million in damages for sexual assault and faces 29 sexual abuse felonies according to court documents.

Carlos Villatoro, a representative for the medical board, declined to comment on the request, citing an ongoing confidential investigation into the matter. However, Villatoro emphasized that the board petitions the courts for action only after finding sufficient evidence against the physician in question, though they did not specify what qualifies as sufficient evidence.

Green accused the board and UCLA of mishandling the investigations into allegations against Heaps. Green claimed that UCLA’s internal Title IX investigation was inherently structured to be unfavorable to Heaps because he had to continue working with someone who had participated in the investigation without his knowledge that they had done so. Title IX guidelines bar the accused from talking about the investigation with UCLA faculty.

Kavinoky and fellow attorney Jennifer McGrath plan to file several more civil lawsuits on behalf of alleged victims in the coming weeks.

Heaps’ third preliminary hearing will be held at Department W31 in the Airport Courthouse on August 29.

Men’s water polo releases 2019 schedule headlined by home match against USC

The 2019 schedule for UCLA men’s water polo was released Monday, featuring a home match against reigning champion USC on Nov. 9.

The Bruins will participate in three regular season tournaments this season, including hosting the SoCal Invitational from Sept. 27-29. They will face California at home Nov. 2, but will travel to play at Stanford on Nov. 16, the last match of the regular season.

Last season, the Bruins lost four of their six games against conference rivals USC and Stanford, including an NCAA semifinal defeat at the hands of the Trojans. UCLA also split its two games with California.

UCLA will open the season in Annapolis, Maryland on Sept. 7 at the Navy Open, where they will face Fordham, Princeton, Navy and La Salle. UCLA defeated Princeton 17-5 in the Princeton Invitational early last season, but hasn’t faced any of the other three schools in over six seasons.

The Bruins will then travel to Stanford for an exhibition match against Pro Recco – an Italian water polo club that plays in Serie A1 – before competing in the Stanford Invitational from Sept. 14-15.

In between the Stanford Invitational and the SoCal Invitational, UCLA will travel to Malibu, California, to take on Pepperdine on Sept. 21.

The Bruins will then stay at home for a month, from the opening match of the SoCal Invitational Sept. 27 until their Oct. 27 game against UC Irvine.

The Bruins will play nine matches during that homestand – including three SoCal Invitational matches and an alumni game.

This fall, UCLA will host Long Beach State, UC Santa Barbara and the University of the Pacific, which they defeated by a combined margin of eight goals across three games last season.

UCLA will play their final road match in the season-ending meeting with Stanford.

The Quad: Plant-based products continue to sprout up as attractive meat alternatives

The prospect of eliminating all meat products from our diets may have, at one time, seemed infeasible – perhaps even “Beyond Impossible.”

However, with the rise of plant-based meats, this once inconceivable lifestyle now seems within reach. Plant-based meat substitutes, such as burger patties headlined by companies like Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods, are intended to replicate the look, taste, and texture of animal meat.

Meat substitutes in the past were typically composed of compressed vegetables or soy. Though viable alternatives to meat, almost all of the sensory properties of these products were slightly off the mark. Today, the goal of the new variety of plant-based meat companies is to imitate meat as accurately as possible.

The plant-based meat industry is booming with this pursuit of precise recreation. According to The Good Food Institute, the dollar sales of plant-based meat have expanded by 37% in the past two years – bringing the plant-based meat market’s value to $801 million.

It appears that these substitutes have become appetizing enough to attract meat eaters as well. In fact, approximately 95% of people who bought a plant-based burger this year were not vegetarians or vegans.

This skyrocketing growth is complemented by the facilitated accessibility of these products. Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat products can be found at fast-food restaurants such as Burger King, White Castle, Carl’s Jr. and Del Taco. According to MarketWatch, 228 million plant-based burgers were served this year at fast-food restaurants like these.

A convincing plant-composed recreation seems to mean a longer list of ingredients as companies attempt to replicate beef using non-beef products. This poses the question: What exactly is in these burgers?

According to the company’s website, the Beyond Burger “looks, cooks, and satisfies like beef.” To accomplish this feat, the patty is composed of 17 ingredients including pea protein isolate, methylcellulose and a list of other potentially eyebrow-raising ingredients.

The Impossible Burger has a similarly lengthy list of ingredients, but one of the most notable is soy leghemoglobin, a form of heme. Heme is found in both plants and animals, and it is said to be responsible for the signature meaty taste we find in animal products. Soy plants contain heme in the form of this soy leghemoglobin, but due to difficulties in extracting this compound directly from the plant, Impossible Foods created a type of yeast to make this compound.

Though “plant-based” usually connotes that a food is clean and nutritious, the creative ways these companies have used to imitate meat may have called into question the health of these meat substitutes.

The Impossible Burger has fewer calories, less total fat and less sodium than the Beyond Burger. However, as compared to a regular beef patty, the Impossible Burger has the same amount of fat, more sodium and more calories. Additionally, skeptics point to the fact that next to the long list of ingredients in the burger substitutes, old-fashioned burgers only have one ingredient: beef.

With respect to the calories, fat and sodium levels of these plant-based patties, it appears they are no healthier than a regular burger. However, it is important to note that their goal is not to be a health food. Rather, they are attempting to mimic meat products that are not exactly health foods themselves.

The health debate may remain, but one thing is for certain – plant-based meats are significantly better for the environment.

The University of Michigan’s Center for Sustainable Systems conducted a study on Beyond Meat that reported the Beyond Burger uses 99% less water and generates 90% less greenhouse gas emissions compared to a beef burger. A similar study conducted by Quantis on the Impossible Burger indicated that the Impossible Burger uses 87% less water and produces 89% fewer greenhouse gas emissions than its beef counterparts.

Dana Hunnes, a clinical dietician at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center with a research background in climate change, food security and the environment, endorses plant-based meats like the ones produced by Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods.

“For anyone who’s craving ‘that meaty texture’ from a burger, for example, I absolutely think that Beyond Burger and Impossible Burger and burgers that are just like that recreate a lot of that taste, that texture and that flavor that people are craving,” Hunnes said. “(The plant-based burgers are) significantly better for the environment by reducing the amount of water it takes to create that patty and the amount of carbon (output) into the environment to create that patty.”

Alongside their environmental benefits, these meat substitutes have the potential to make a significant impact in alleviating animal maltreatment within the meat industry.

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals reports that most of the 10 billion land animals farmed for food every year in the United States live in “unacceptable conditions.” Animals on these farms can experience overcrowding, unsanitary conditions, indoor confinement and man-made alterations to their bodies.

On a similar note, Amber Canavan, senior campaigner with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, denounced the marketing claims of some meat companies that use labels that suggest the animals used for meat are enjoying a higher quality of life.

“Consumers are being misled by the marketing of these companies, and the only truly humane meat is the vegan meat. We have so many options that we simply don’t need to be killing animals to get the delicious, nutritious, tasty foods that we enjoy,” Canavan said.

With all of these factors considered, the reason behind the fascination with the plant-based meat industry becomes apparent. And, as evidenced by Beyond Meat’s gain of over 550% from its IPO pricing as of June 10 and Impossible Foods’ fundraising total of more than $775 million, it appears that the plant-based meat industry is just getting started.

Sepulveda Pass rail station sees increased cost projections as project continues

This post was updated July 30 at 10:25 a.m.

Updates to the Sepulveda Transit Corridor Project include higher cost estimates, projected ridership numbers and plans for more public input.

Although the STC Project was initially estimated to cost $5.678 billion, which would be drawn from Measure M, a Los Angeles sales tax used to raise money for public transportation and roads, current estimated costs for the four potential rail line concepts that the Los Angeles Metro is exploring vary in cost from $9.4 billion to $13.8 billion.

Daily riderships projected for rail lines in 2042 range between 122,000 and 137,000, according to Metro data. The project is currently in its third round of community meetings, and is still seeking input on potential railway connections, station locations and connections.

The STC is a planned Metro rail line intended to provide a public transit option between San Fernando Valley, the Westside and the Los Angeles International Airport. It also plans to construct a station at UCLA as part of the project.

Preliminary ridership figures indicate the UCLA station will be the busiest nontransfer station in the entire Metro system. Early projections for this stop estimate ridership to be between 17,000 and 18,000 riders per day.

The Metro hopes to complete the Valley-Westside portion of the project in time for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games, as part of the Metro’s Twenty-Eight by ‘28 initiative. The scheduled completion date for the overall project is 2033, according to the Metro’s website.

Project leaders are considering either heavy rail or monorail transit. Using a light rail transit option, which would carry fewer passengers than the other options, was taken out of consideration after community input indicated it would not be able to meet the demand projected, said Cory Zelmer, the project manager for the STC, in a press briefing.

Peter Carter, deputy project manager at the Metro, said they will have to tunnel more than they had expected, increasing estimated costs.

“It’s certainly not the first Metro project that has a cost estimate more than its initial estimate and it’s certainly not going to be the last,” Carter said. “This is an ongoing conversation, and even these cost estimates will continue to be refined over the course of the project.”

Zelmer said in the briefing that the project’s initial objective was to connect Westwood to the Metro Orange Line from the Westside and to the planned light rail line along Van Nuys Boulevard. However, after the light rail line was taken out of consideration, the four Sepulveda options were extended further north to meet public demand.

Zelmer said while project leaders will still try to get close to the initial estimated cost, they will also seek outside funding, such as federal and state grants.

Part of the effort to reduce costs could also involve collaboration with private contractors through a predevelopment agreement, in which private contractors can provide input during the planning process, meaning they could have more control over the project design and potentially share some of the construction risk.

The Metro is also considering a potential station on Santa Monica Boulevard and an Overland Avenue alignment on the Westside to LAX route. Both of these will be evaluated with further community input, cost analysis potential and environmental effects, among other criteria.

UCLA is in discussions with the Metro about possibly locating the station near the turnaround loop by the Meyer and Renee Luskin Conference Center. It will connect with the Metro Purple Line Extension station at Wilshire and Westwood boulevards. The station will open with completion of the final subway section to Westwood Boulevard and the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 2027, said Jody Litvak, the Metro community relations director of local government and external affairs.

Litvak previously said in the press briefing construction for a stop on the extension at Westwood Boulevard and Wilshire Boulevard is still projected to be completed by 2026.

A meeting will be held for community members at the St. Paul the Apostle Church on Tuesday from 6 to 8 p.m. as part of the project’s third round of public meetings.

There will also be a meeting held Saturday at the Marvin Braude San Fernando Valley Constituent Service Center in Van Nuys from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Campus Queries: What are rip currents and how can students stay safe against them?

Campus Queries is a series in which Daily Bruin readers and staff present science-related questions for UCLA professors and experts to answer.

Q: What are rip currents and why are they important?

A: Beachgoers often overlook the hidden danger that is a rip current during their visits to the ocean, potentially resulting in an unpleasant surprise for swimmers.

Rip currents are a result of waves breaking under the influence of gravity, causing water – and swimmers – to move away from the shoreline.

When unsuspecting swimmers at the beach are caught in a rip current, they are carried away from the shoreline regardless of how hard they might try to swim directly against the current, said National Weather Service forecaster Ryan Kittell.

Rip currents can form anywhere along Southern California beaches and are a prevalent danger for swimmers, Kittell added.

The waves causing rip currents are formed by local and distant wind currents moving over the ocean’s surface, said James McWilliams, an atmospheric and oceanic sciences professor.

The waves approach shallow waters, become steeper and begin to tumble into the water as gravity breaks apart the shape of the wave, he added.

Once the waves fold in on themselves, some of the waves’ momentum transfers into shallow currents that move back into deeper waters. These shallow yet strong currents are known as rip currents.

McWilliams said rip current strength depends on when local or remote winds are strong, which means that rip currents are strongest during the winter when winds have the greatest effect on the ocean. However, Kittell said the period of greatest concern about the dangers of rip currents are summer and fall, because beach attendance is highest during that time frame.

“When there’s a lot of people in the water, it doesn’t take much of a rip current to cause a big issue,” Kittell said.

Kittell added winter storms in the southern hemisphere could also increase the strength and number of rip currents in the ocean near Southern California beaches during the summer, providing another cause for concern.

The best way to spot rip currents is to observe any discolorations in the water or swirling seaweed or debris moving away from the shore, said junior lifeguard instructor and third-year global studies student Ellie Graessle.

“One of the biggest signs that you’re caught in a rip current is that it pulls you (away from shore) but it doesn’t necessarily pull you underneath the water,” Graessle said.

The danger of rip currents lies in the fact that swimmers attempt to fight the current directly, which exhausts them quickly, Graessle said.

Any swimmer caught in a rip current should swim parallel to the shore, not directly against the rip current, until they can’t feel the pull of the current, Graessle said. Once the swimmer escapes the current, they should then begin swimming back to the shore as lifeguards head over to rescue them.

Beachgoers should take advantage of the numerous lifeguards present at beaches and ask them about swimming conditions and their assessment of the locations of currents, Kittell said.

“There’s such a large number of lifeguard stations and lifeguards in the (LA) county beaches,” Kittell said. “So strike up a conversation with them and get a good assessment of what’s going on in the waters.”