Alumna’s gift provides funding for program supporting women in engineering

The UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science received $5 million to fund an engineering program for women, a university press release announced Tuesday.

Stacey Nicholas donated to UCLA to create a permanent fund for its Women in Engineering program. Nicholas is an alumna of the school of engineering, where she earned her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in electrical engineering.

Nicholas founded the Opus Foundation in Irvine, which promotes STEM education as well as the arts. Previously, Nicholas donated to the UC Irvine Henry Samueli School of Engineering in 2014.

The Women in Engineering program began two years ago and aims to support women in engineering and computer science, according to its website.

The program offers opportunities for peer mentorship, early research and internships to all students. It also hosts a leadership academy that invites female leaders in engineering fields as guest speakers, according to its website.

Women are outnumbered by male peers in the school of engineering. Females represented 26.9% of undergraduate students in the school of engineering in fall 2018, according to a school of engineering report to the University-Wide Council on Engineering Education. This marks an increase from 25.4% in fall 2017 and 19.1% in fall 2008.

Among the specific majors within the school, bioengineering has the highest percentage of female enrollment at 48.8%, and electrical engineering has the lowest at 15.3%. Female graduate student enrollment was at 23% in fall 2018.

Cultivating geographic diversity would help UCLA to expand students’ perspectives

To Californians, UCLA is a reputed public university with a lot of school spirit. Ask someone in the Midwest, though, and they might just think it’s a stronghold of abortion rights-, gun control-advocating college liberals.

You wonder why UCLA has no enrolled students from Wyoming.

UCLA talks a lot about diversity among its student body. But lost in this conversation is the glaring lack of geographic diversity among Bruins.

UCLA is a public California university, and understandably prioritizes the enrollment of in-state students. University of California policy caps out-of-state enrollment at 18% of the entire student body. But who makes up this 18% is massively skewed.

According to UCLA Institutional Research, 24,150 Californian undergraduates are currently enrolled at UCLA. From the roughly 7,000 remaining students, there are large parts of the country that have little representation at all.

UCLA has 10 or fewer students from many states in the Deep South, including Alabama, Arkansas and Mississippi. The Midwest is similarly underrepresented. Less than 10 students come from each Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota, and 12 come from Idaho. No Bruins call the Equality State their home.

But cultivating geographic diversity at UCLA is crucial to strengthening diversity of thought. Having students from different backgrounds increases diversity, as students are more likely to encounter a viewpoint or experience different than their own. Such diversity of thought is important as it prevents echo chambers, where students only hear perspectives that strengthen their existing views and miss out on opportunities to learn from their peers’ ideologies.

UCLA should increase admissions outreach efforts in underrepresented regions of the country, such as the Midwest and South. Doing so would strengthen diversity of thought at UCLA and offer students a more intellectually stimulating environment – something vital to any university.

UCLA clearly does well in its outreach toward underrepresented communities in California. The Los Angeles Times reported in 2016 that UCLA had expanded intensive recruiting to reach marginalized students. UCLA admissions recruiters show up at community events and college fairs in these communities to scout promising students.

But the university doesn’t do this for out-of-state students, despite its lack of geographic diversity.

“UCLA does outreach only in California, and our recruitment efforts are mostly focused on in-state students,” said UCLA spokesperson Ricardo Vazquez.

A lack of regional diversity hurts ideological diversity, as students are less likely to meet those outside their own background and circumstances. Such shrinking of perspectives contributes to the primarily left-leaning bastion that is UCLA, which doesn’t challenge students to question their viewpoints.

Gary Orfield, a professor of education, law, political science and urban planning, said universities that value leadership and ideological diversity among their students help themselves by expanding geographic diversity.

“If UCLA has the aspiration to train more national leaders, then geographic diversity is very important,” Orfield said. “African Americans from the South have different experiences from those who grew up in Oakland, as Latinos from the East Coast have different experiences from those growing up in Southern California.”

Orfield is right. Such diversity better prepares students for the real world where they won’t always be in proximity to those with similar backgrounds.

These ideas about intellectual diversity are supported by UCLA’s own statement on diversity, which emphasizes the importance of working to increase the “spectrum of perspectives available on campus.”

Brayden Sutton, a first-year biochemistry student from North Carolina, said he thinks it’s important that UCLA emphasize diversity of background. He said he’s from a rural, conservative community with strong views on issues such as gun control.

The California bubble at UCLA, however, limits the contribution of people with these perspectives, impeding the inclusivity the campus administration likes to tout.

Catherine LaRue, a third-year economics student from Topeka, Kansas, said she was surprised by her peers’ lack of knowledge about areas outside California.

“People assume I live on a farm,” LaRue said. “A big part of college is seeing what’s outside of what you’re used to and people from other backgrounds can contribute there.”

Similarly, Mariah McCashland, a third-year neuroscience student from Nebraska, said that her community in Lincoln is relatively conservative on issues such as gun laws and feminism.

“There’s a huge difference of background that you get at UCLA compared to Lincoln,” she said. “Certain things (are) more popular to take a side on here – it’s definitely more popular to be a social liberal.”

Many communities in other states rarely see any signs of UCLA activity, and sending recruiters to those regions would raise the school’s profile among students who might otherwise not know to apply.

It’s true UCLA has a priority to serve Californians first, and not all out-of-state students are interested in applying to the university. But this shouldn’t mean kicking geographic diversity to the curb and foregoing the chance to raise UCLA’s profile among underrepresented regions.

The university is a better institution when its out-of-state enrollment reflects the unique and disparate regions that make up America. After all, the real world is full of both churchgoing, gun-loving Midwesterners and hip, abortion-rights Angelenos who drink Yerba Mate.

Graduating players shine on Senior Night as men’s volleyball sweeps Concordia

All of the Bruin seniors contributed to a conference win on Senior Night.

No. 5 UCLA (18-7, 8-3 MPSF) defeated No. 14 Concordia University Irvine (14-17, 3-8) in straight sets by scores of 25-19, 25-19 and 25-19.

The Bruins were down in the first set 8-10 before they won the next seven points to take the lead at 15-10. Two points were service aces from sophomore middle blocker Grant Maleski, as UCLA totaled six aces in the match.

The Bruins kept the lead until the score was 23-18. Senior defensive specialist Spencer Sachs then subbed in and served as UCLA won the point to take the lead 24-18 before the Bruins won the set by a score of 25-19. Sachs had only played in one set this year against Lewis before subbing in tonight. Sachs said he was grateful for the opportunity to play on Senior Night.

“Being able to get in here at Pauley Pavilion in front of my friends and family is definitely a highlight,” Sachs said. “It’s bittersweet. UCLA and the men’s volleyball team has been an unbelievable experience for me. I appreciate everything.”

UCLA hit for .400 in the second set as it accumulated 16 kills and two hitting errors. The Bruins also posted five team blocks in the set and held Concordia to a .184 hitting percentage. With UCLA leading 24-19, graduating redshirt junior middle blocker Jonah Kay subbed in and picked up the final kill to win the set 25-19. Kay also only played in one match against UC San Diego earlier this season. He said he was prepared for his opportunity to enter the game.

“(My team) told me to commit on the other middle blocker so I could have a chance one-on-one,” Kay said. “I had an inkling (that I would play today). I was staying warm and prepared and was able to answer the call.”

Coach John Speraw said he was fortunate that Sachs and Kay could both get in the game.

“In any sport with a clock, it’s virtually impossible sometimes to come back based on the time,” Speraw said. “We don’t have that (in volleyball). So I’m really grateful we had the opportunity to get (Sachs and Kay) in.”

The Bruins finished the match by winning the third set again by a score of 25-19, as they held the lead throughout the set.

Senior setter Micah Ma’a and senior outside hitter Dylan Missry ended the match with the second and third most kills on the team. The duo had eight and seven kills, respectively, as Ma’a hit for .238 and Missry hit for .333.

The Bruins will travel across town to face rival No. 6 USC (15-9, 6-5) on Saturday. UCLA will need a win to have a shot at claiming the top seed in the MPSF conference.

Pac-12 champs UCLA gymnastics to capitalize on mental strength in NCAA regional

The Bruins are one step closer to another national title.

No. 2 UCLA gymnastics (9-1) is heading to the NCAA regionals this weekend in Ann Arbor, Michigan. On Friday, the team will face off against No. 14 Nebraska (5-3), No. 27 West Virginia (0-1) and No. 29 Illinois (4-3), which earned the spot after winning a dual meet with No. 30 Central Michigan (8-2) on Thursday.

The top two teams from the quad meet will continue on to Sunday’s competition – the NCAA regional final – where they will meet the top two teams from the quad meet between No. 7 Michigan (5-2), No. 10 Alabama (5-4), No. 23 Penn State (1-6) and No. 26 Ohio State (5-3). From there, the two highest scoring teams will head to the NCAA championships.

The Bruins are the No. 1 seed in the Ann Arbor region. Of the three other teams UCLA will face Friday, it has only competed against Nebraska, beating the Cornhuskers 197.250-195.700 on Jan. 4.

Senior Katelyn Ohashi said the Bruins are calm despite the pressure of being the favorite.

“Mentally, we’re pretty solid,” Ohashi said. “No one’s really disclosed any nerves. I think we’ve prepared really well for (the postseason) all season and this is where it kind of comes into play. I think everyone’s really ready.”

And coach Valorie Kondos Field agreed.

“I feel we’re right on track,” Kondos Field said. “We have done really well, the team is extremely tight and connected. They’ve gone through some serious team meetings with me where I’ve challenged them to make some better choices outside of the gym and they’ve responded very well and are holding each other and themselves accountable.”

UCLA posted a 198.400 in the Pac-12 championships March 23, taking home first place and garnering the highest score in the nation so far this season.

However, freshman Margzetta Frazier said that the Bruins’ biggest takeaway from that meet was not the win, but rather the energy and focus the athletes displayed.

“The main message (we tell ourselves) is the phrase ‘all in,’” Frazier said. “We’ve been saying that nonstop, ‘all in, all in’ because we only have 18 days left and we want to have no regrets. We’re pushing ourselves 100% so no matter how the season ends, we’re happy with ourselves and we can send (off) our coach (with) a nice farewell.”

As UCLA wades deeper into the postseason, it is also moving toward the end of Kondos Field’s career as head coach. However, that fact has not altered the Bruins’ focus on winning the national title.

“I honestly forget until someone brings it up because it feels so natural with (Kondos Field) here,” Frazier said. “It just feels like any other day, and I don’t think it’ll hit me until probably after championships. But it just makes every moment more special because this is literally history.”

No. 1 UCLA baseball preps for No. 2 Stanford in road series this weekend

The top two teams in the country will square off this weekend.

No. 1 UCLA baseball (21-5, 7-2 Pac-12) will play at No. 2 Stanford (19-3, 6-0) in a three-game series starting Friday night. This is the first and only time the Bruins will face the Cardinal during the regular season.

Stanford enters Friday’s game having won 10 in a row to move up to No. 2 in the rankings, while UCLA has won eight of its last nine to secure the top spot. Both teams have yet to lose a series this year.

The Bruins played in another highly ranked matchup earlier in the season, winning their series against Oregon State Beavers when the teams were ranked second and third in the nation, respectively.

Junior third baseman Ryan Kreidler said the key to UCLA’s success in these types of series is to treat them like any other and avoid distractions.

“We just want to come out on Friday and be ourselves,” Kreidler said. “That’s the big thing for us. We’re not really worried about any hype or anything. We know (Stanford) is a solid team, but we also know it’s just a Pac-12 road series.”

Last season, the Bruins won the series against the Cardinal for the second straight year. However, Stanford ultimately won the Pac-12 title with a 22-8 conference record.

This year, the Cardinal are once again atop the Pac-12 standings, going undefeated through their first six conference games.

“Stanford is a legitimate team,” said coach John Savage. “They had a really good team last year and a lot of those guys are older and more experienced now. It’s going to be a tremendous challenge for us.”

The series will also feature a matchup between two of the conference’s top pitching staffs. The Cardinal and the Bruins lead the Pac-12 in ERA, at 2.36 and 2.54, respectively.

“It will be fun to have a good pitchers’ battle,” said redshirt junior right-hander Jack Ralston. “These two teams that are playing are obviously two of the best teams in the country. So it will be a good series.”

Stanford’s 2.83 ERA last year was also the best mark in the conference – but its pitching staff surrendered 26 runs in the three-game series against UCLA. Junior second baseman Chase Strumpf led the charge for the Bruins’ offense, going 6-for-9 with a pair of homers en route to a series victory at home for UCLA.

Sophomore right-hander Zach Pettway will start Friday’s game and is the only starter with experience against the Cardinal. He was pulled in the third inning of his start last year, having allowed eight runs.

According to Savage, these games against top competition present a unique opportunity.

“It helps a lot to face competitive teams,” Savage said. “But you have to survive it. If you do that and come out of it, then you’re very well prepared.”

First pitch will be 6:05 p.m. on Friday, followed by 2:05 p.m. and 1:05 p.m. start times Saturday and Sunday, respectively.

New USAC election chair accused of anti-Semitism, ready for 2019 elections

Student government officials appointed a new election board chair mid-March amid student concerns about comments made by the appointee that some considered to be anti-Semitic.

Kyana Shajari, a third-year psychology student, was appointed election chair by the Undergraduate Student Association Council at its March 12 meeting.

Shajari was formerly the investigative director of the election board, but was appointed as chair to replace former election board chair Richard White and has been involved with USAC since January. USAC removed White from the position a week before Shajari’s appointment.

However, her appointment was a matter of debate among USAC members, who appointed Shajari with a vote of 5-4 and two abstentions, with President Claire Fieldman casting the tie-breaking vote.

During the March 12 hearing, Justin Feldman, a third-year political science and Middle Eastern studies student, raised concerns about a comment previously posted in the profile description on Shajari’s personal Instagram account, which he thought to be anti-Semitic.

Aaron Boudaie, a former Financial Supports commissioner, said he also thought the comment was overtly anti-Semitic. Boudaie added he thought Shajari’s appointment indicated the council does not take anti-Semitic comments as seriously as it might take other types of hate comments.

“I think that this council perhaps is not as educated on the history of anti-Semitism, and that’s why maybe they don’t take it as seriously as other forms of identity-based hatred,” Boudaie said.

Bella Martin, a USAC general representative, said at the March 12 meeting that she shared similar concerns, and asked the council to consider whether they would appoint a candidate who had made comments regarding another racial or ethnic group.

“What if this microaggression in the bio of a candidate were anti-black or anti-Muslim or transphobic?” Martin said. “Through this perspective, would we be kind of accepting apologies? Would we be rationalizing it as like not a big deal, and something that we can kind of claim as ignorance? I would venture to say that we’d be more up in arms.”

Martin ultimately voted against Shajari’s appointment.

Shajari said she sincerely apologized for the previous comment on her profile and said it was originally a misguided attempt to use humor as a defense mechanism.

“It was not meant to be targeted whatsoever, it was just a stupid attempt to defend myself and I could have absolutely done it a different way,” Shajari said. “It was a dumb move.”

Fieldman said in an email statement she thought Shajari demonstrated her ability to learn from her mistakes, and that she was confident the experience will help Shajari foster a positive election environment.

Shajari has been a member of the election board since January and was previously the election board chair and interclub council chair at Santa Monica College.

Shajari said she thought her previous experience with school organizations made her suitable for the position.

“I kind of have some knowledge about the ways elections work, like the dynamics that happen during elections, just because I have the experience at SMC, so I thought I would be a good fit for the election board chair here,” Shajari said.

Fieldman said she recommended Shajari to the council because of her prior experience managing elections, but added since the appointment happened so close to the 2019 election season, Shajari will have to overcome the learning curve very quickly.

“She has been working on the board as investigations director for months now and is directly familiar with the elections process and its demands,” Fieldman said. “She also has a team of board members to support her.”

Shajari said she wants to make sure the 2019 election is incident-free.

“Obviously every chair’s goal is to make things go smoothly and that’s also my goal as well, and I just kind of want to make people feel safe and have people follow the rules, do things the right way and just have a fair, clean, transparent election,” Shajari said.

Before the beginning of spring quarter, some due dates for slate and candidate registration materials were changed from winter to spring quarter so Shajari could receive all the proper election board account credentials in time.

However, Shajari said the 2019 USAC election is set to continue as planned according to the 2019 USAC election calendar. Fieldman said despite the unusual circumstances, she expects the election will continue unaffected.

“Though this appointment was made under extraordinary circumstances, it will not substantively affect the elections calendar that has already undergone USAC confirmation,” Fieldman said.

UCLA’s EDI office needs to cement long-term goals, publicize its progress

Avengers: Endgame is coming out April 26.

Equity, diversity and inclusion at UCLA: Endgame is nowhere in sight.

UCLA’s Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion was founded in 2015 to uphold its values of diversity. The office was created after the Moreno Report, a detailed document published by Carlos Moreno, a former California Supreme Court justice, that highlighted discrimination in the hiring and makeup of the faculty at UCLA.

The EDI office has since worked to make faculty hiring more equitable and the faculty makeup more diverse. But despite the changes it has implemented, UCLA continues to fall short in three ways: equity, diversity and inclusion.

The office’s efforts are largely focused on the faculty. It has overhauled the faculty search committees to account for implicit biases against specific groups. Administrators have also instituted training for those serving on faculty selection committees, and made sure that biases are accounted for as well as they can be.

But the EDI office seems to have no endgame – when will it transition from focusing on faculty to addressing student concerns? This disconnect is magnified by the EDI office’s unclear goals from a student standpoint, hindering its ability to promote equity, diversity and inclusion to the heart of UCLA: its students.

Administrators seem to miss this.

“(The EDI office) makes sure that there is fair and inclusive hiring,” said Jerry Kang, UCLA’s vice chancellor of equity, diversity and inclusion. “(Faculty hiring) is arguably the most human element that is the most long-lasting.”

The faculty body might be the longest lasting part of UCLA, but students are its most human element. Students dictate the campus’ culture and atmosphere, and they’re the lifeblood of the university. Changing faculty doesn’t directly influence the student body’s diversity, which should be the priority of the EDI office. Additionally, changing faculty hiring practices isn’t something students can readily see the results of during their years on campus, making it understandable that the office’s messaging can go unnoticed.

 

Itzeel Padilla, a second-year ecology, behavior and evolution student, said awareness is the biggest reason students can’t always understand the EDI office’s motives.

 

“Nobody really talks about why diversity is actually important,” Padilla said. “We’re just told that it is.”

But UCLA’s student body has serious diversity problems. For one, black students make up only 3% of the undergraduate population, but more than half of UCLA’s male, black students are athletes – meaning the university largely seeks out members of the black community for their athletic ability, not their academic strengths.

The university shouldn’t be satisfied with the state of its student body, said Markie Vialpando, a first-year neuroscience student.

“The diversity with students on campus still has a ways to go,” Vialpando said.

Yet it’s unclear what the EDI office is doing about this: Issues of campus diversity don’t seem to be subject to action of the EDI office, even though they would appear to be – rather, they’re reserved for the admissions office and not spoken about much. This makes it easy for students to lose faith, since it’s hazy how the EDI office, well, promotes student diversity.

David Wang, a third-year bioengineering student, said the EDI office doesn’t inform students of its goals or actions, leading to doubt.

 

“I think that, yeah, we should be more diverse, but it’s hard to say what that would look like in terms of actual public policy,” Wang said. “How do we know anything’s getting done?”

A way to address this is to effectively communicate what exactly the office does, what its long term goals are and what makes its values of diversity and inclusion important at UCLA. For instance, events on the Hill would go a long way in ameliorating the disconnect students have with the office.

“It’s important to communicate these things to the student body, so that people know that they’re there,” said Jonathan Tai, a third-year engineering student.

There’s also the issue of implementing policies that won’t be seen or heard by students. In this case, invisible policies are problematic because they can breed skepticism about what they actually change, and whether they’re actually helpful to the university.

Of course, UCLA does hold events about diversity and inclusion that try to explain the rationale behind its actions. The problem is that events specifically addressing diversity on campus are too few and far between. That, coupled with the fact that they’re poorly promoted, limits student attendance.

Ultimately, the EDI office has a large task ahead of it: promoting equity, diversity and inclusion on a campus with hundreds of thousands of stakeholders. And it’s difficult to address both the faculty and the student body issues at once. However, it’s been more than three years since the Moreno Report was published. Multiple policies have been implemented to improve the faculty body’s diversity. Students want an office that promotes diversity and inclusion and educates them in these matters, and this university clearly needs one.

 

Granted, the EDI office isn’t the Avengers. But it doesn’t take a superhero to be clear about your long-term purpose and be transparent about what you do.