UCLA has not seen more white supremacist activity on campus since fall 2016, despite a rise in such behavior on other college campuses.
A report released by the Anti-Defamation League on Jan. 29 reported an increase in white supremacist recruitment on college campuses following the inauguration of President Donald Trump. There were 147 reports nationwide of white supremacist activity, including fliers, stickers and banners, in fall 2017, almost three times as much as in fall 2016.
The ADL is a civil rights agency that fights anti-Semitism and discrimination.
The report also found that in most cases, offensive posters on college campuses were placed there by outside groups. In November 2016, a group calling itself the “UCLA White Students Group” put up posters on campus with white supremacist views and warnings that were later removed by the university.
California had the second-highest number of incidents, at 43. ADL spokesperson Ariella Schusterman said California and Texas are home to the largest and most active membership for Identity Evropa and Patriot Front, groups that frequently employ flyers and posters on college campuses to recruit members. She added groups often use propaganda that avoid recognizable white supremacist imagery to try to attract students.
“White supremacists see campuses as a fertile recruiting ground – students on campus are prepared to soak up as much information and life experience as possible,” Schusterman said.
Barry O’Neill, a political science professor, said political groups often communicate racist messages to their followers that outsiders cannot tell are racist.
“Some politicians have the ability to communicate a racist message, without being explicit about it,” he said.
UCLA officials said the campus has not seen a rise in white supremacist activity over the past year.
UCPD Lt. Kevin Kilgore said UCPD recorded three to four hate incidents in both 2016 and 2017. He added hate speech is classified as a hate incident, and would only be considered a hate crime if it occurs with another crime such as theft or vandalism.
Several UCLA experts said they think the report showed hateful actions are being normalized throughout the country.
O’Neill said free speech can sometimes allow hurtful behavior and attitudes to spread.
“On the one hand, free speech is an American principle, and it’s a right in the Constitution,” he said. “On the other hand, racist talk is hurtful, and racist attitudes can spread.”
Chris Tausanovitch, a political science assistant professor, said he thinks Trump’s casual denigration of racial and religious minorities makes it appear more acceptable for individuals to commit hateful acts.
Ron Rogowski, a political science professor, said he thinks the increase in white supremacy incidents on college campuses is concerning because the Nazi Party first came to power by winning a majority in the national federation of German university students.
“If assumedly intelligent students can be converted so easily into unashamed and violent racists, just because racist speech becomes first officially tolerated and then officially promoted, it can probably occur anywhere, certainly including here,” he said.
Kosi Ogbuli, a second-year neuroscience and political science student and vice chair of the Afrikan Student Union, said he thinks the university has a poor track record of dealing with hateful incidents because of how they reacted to Ben Shapiro’s campus visit last year. Hundreds of students protested when Shapiro, a conservative commentator, UCLA alumnus and former Daily Bruin staffer, gave a speech on campus.
“UCLA handles things in a very reactive way – when Ben Shapiro came to campus, the university reacted to the protests and the unrest, rather than addressing what caused them,” he said.
Ogbuli said he thinks white supremacy is still institutionalized in society as a whole because power structures in society benefit certain groups over others.
“It’s not as blatant as it was in the ‘60s, but you can see white supremacy … through stagnancy, in contentment with things as they are and with the tendency to be regressive rather than progressive,” he said.
Isn’t the label ‘white supremacy’ just a replacement for the term ‘racist?’
‘Racist’ has lost its sting thru overuse so we turn to Definitional Hypertrophy, i.e. moving the goal posts, so ‘White nationalist’ or indeed any form of White political organizing, turns to ‘white supremacist’ in order to0 attach the pejorative to whites organizing.
similarly over the years ‘racism’ has expanded from actual government regulations about water fountains and buses and schools to ‘merely noticing race.’
Definitional hypertrophy is like the frog in the frying pan, turn up the heat ever so slowly and most will not notice.
Identity Europa is white supremacist.
You support black supremacist BLM, Muslim supremacist CAIR, and Mexican supremacist MS-13.
So it is not okay to be White?
I was going to suggest that in order to fund the White Guilt Bank of the United States we should institute a new 3 per cent tax on the sale of all mayonnaise.
Now a days everything seems to be offensive or racist. The article does not even tell us what these people say or do. Were criminal acts committed? I question the seriousness of an article that quotes the vice chair of the Afrikan Students Union, but not any member of the groups that are being labeled racist / white supremacist.
Is it hypocrisy or willful ignorance? You don’t know what sort of criminal acts are committed by the white supremacist trash!
You are black Muslim supremacist trash who torches colleges and kills over cartoons.
“O’Neill said free speech can sometimes allow hurtful behavior and attitudes to spread.”
Life is hard, reality bears the truths we tend to shy away from. You cannot shut down people’s right to free speech, as our forefathers had left behind for us because you “don’t like” what others have to say. The greatest thinkers and inventors of old were great not because they succumbed to ideological dogma, but because they challenged the limits of what we ought to think or believe.
To think modern academia has come to this point is awfully disheartening. I hope sometime in the future these institutions can reassert their original goals of challenging ideas and debating through civil discourse. But for know, they will continue to make fools of themselves.
The real threats are black supremacists and Muslim supremacists.
Nope
Democrats like you always make excuses for copkillers, jihadists, and MS-13.
Always the same BS. Blahbahblah like you are blahblahblah who blahblahblah.
Look, it’s the racist black Muslim coward.
“O’Neill said free speech can sometimes allow hurtful behavior and attitudes to spread.”
Life is hard, reality bears the truths we tend to shy away from. You cannot shut down people’s right to free speech, as our forefathers had left behind for us because you “don’t like” what others have to say. The greatest thinkers and inventors of old were great because they challenged the limits of what we ought to think or believe. These people you speak of do not condone violence. Try talking to these “white supremacists” for once instead of shouting, I’m sure you could learn a lot from each other – they are people too and have many important issues that hit close to home as well.
To think modern academia has come to this point is awfully disheartening. I hope sometime in the future these institutions can reassert their original goals of being open to ideological differences and debating through civil discourse. But for now, they will continue to make fools of themselves.