Is the importance of a dead terrorist’s iPhone data less important because it is after-the-fact? Would CEO Tim Cook take a different position if the terrorist attack had happened at Apple headquarters, and God forbid, killed dozens of Apple employees? On a more personal level, imagine the following: you come home to find your wife and kids have been brutally murdered. At the crime scene, the police find an iPhone, presumably belonging to the killer, who is still at-large. Would you want Apple to hack into the phone if the police had no other way to crack the case?
If your just going to plagiarize stuff at least site the source or let a doctor crack your brain open so he can help you figure out who’s the assaulting canidate. Oh, also please just don’t say anything back because you’ll just make yourself look like a fool.
Is the importance of a dead terrorist’s iPhone data less important because it is after-the-fact? Would CEO Tim Cook take a different position if the terrorist attack had happened at Apple headquarters, and God forbid, killed dozens of Apple employees? On a more personal level, imagine the following: you come home to find your wife and kids have been brutally murdered. At the crime scene, the police find an iPhone, presumably belonging to the killer, who is still at-large. Would you want Apple to hack into the phone if the police had no other way to crack the case?
Is the importance of a dead terrorist’s iPhone data less important because it is after-the-fact? Would CEO Tim Cook take a different position if the terrorist attack had happened at Apple headquarters, and God forbid, killed dozens of Apple employees? On a more personal level, imagine the following: you come home to find your wife and kids have been brutally murdered. At the crime scene, the police find an iPhone, presumably belonging to the killer, who is still at-large. Would you want Apple to hack into the phone if the police had no other way to crack the case?
If your just going to plagiarize stuff at least site the source or let a doctor crack your brain open so he can help you figure out who’s the assaulting canidate. Oh, also please just don’t say anything back because you’ll just make yourself look like a fool.
Is the importance of a dead terrorist’s iPhone data less important because it is after-the-fact? Would CEO Tim Cook take a different position if the terrorist attack had happened at Apple headquarters, and God forbid, killed dozens of Apple employees? On a more personal level, imagine the following: you come home to find your wife and kids have been brutally murdered. At the crime scene, the police find an iPhone, presumably belonging to the killer, who is still at-large. Would you want Apple to hack into the phone if the police had no other way to crack the case?