USAC passes divestment resolution with 8-2-2 vote

Do you read your own links?????

The Muslim Conquest was not a migration, did not ethnically cleanse anyone.

Dowty, Alan (2008). Israel/Palestine. London, UK: Polity. p. 221.
‘Palestinians are the descendants of all the indigenous peoples who lived in Palestine over the centuries; since the seventh century, they have been predominantly Muslim in religion and almost completely Arab in language and culture.’

‘Palestinians are an indigenous people who either live in, or originate from,
historical Palestine. Although the Muslims guaranteed security and allowed religious freedom to all inhabitants of the region, the majority converted to Islam and adopted Arab culture.’ Bassam Abu-Libdeh, Peter D. Turnpenny, and Ahmed Teebi, ‘Genetic Disease in Palestine and Palestinians,’ in Dhavendra Kuma (ed.) Genomics
and Health in the Developing World, OUP 2012 pp.700-711, p.700.

David Ben-Gurion and Yitzhak Ben-Zvi claimed that the population at the
time of the Arab conquest was mainly Christian, of Jewish origins, which underwent conversion to avoid a tax burden, basing their argument on ‘the fact that at the time of the Arab conquest, the population of Palestine was mainly Christian, and that during the Crusaders’ conquest some four hundred years later, it was mainly
Muslim. As neither the Byzantines nor the Muslims carried out any large-scale population resettlement projects, the Christians were the offspring of the Jewish and Samaritan farmers who converted to Christianity in the Byzantine period; while the Muslim fellaheen in Palestine in modern times are descendants of those Christians who were the descendants of Jews, and had turned to Islam before the Crusaders’ conquest.’ Moshe Gil, A History of Palestine,634-1099 Cambridge University Press, (1983) 1997 pp.222-3

‘While population transfers were effected in the Assyrian, Babylonian and Persian periods, most of the indigenous population remained in place. Moreover, after Jerusalem was destroyed in AD 70 the population by and large remained in situ,
and did so again after Bar Kochba’s revolt in AD 135. When the vast majority of the population became Christian during the Byzantine period, no vast number were driven out, and similarly in the seventh century, when the vast majority became Muslim, few were driven from the land. Palestine has been multi-cultural and multi ethnic from the beginning, as one can read between the lines even in the biblical
narrative. Many Palestinian Jews became Christians, and in turn Muslims. Ironically, many of the forebears of Palestinian Arab refugees may well have been Jewish.’ Micheal Prior, Zionism and the State of Israel: A Moral Inquiry, Psychology Press 1999 p.201

Ben Gurion is a Palestinian propagandist????

Just out of curiosity, is there anything that you’ve actually read on the subject? I mean other than zio-nazi websites.

There is not one historian claiming that indigenous populations were displaced during the Muslim Conquest. Not one.

Stop playing with the adults and go to school.

Link to a country that recognizes Israeli sovereignty or claim to the West Bank, Gaza, East J’lem or the Golan. Name me one country with an embassy in J’lem. Give us a UNSC Resolution.

PROVE me wrong. Saying ‘Liar! Liar!’ doesn’t impress anyone.

In other words, you have no link.

UNSC 242 is very clear: Step one–Israel withdraws from the occupied territories. Step two–Make peace.

We’re still waiting for the withdrawal.

All countries in the world and every institution of international law recognize the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Specifically, this means the illegal Israeli squats are a war crime. All countries in the world and every institution of international law recognize the principle of no acquisition of territory by war.

Just to spell it out to a child like yourself:

‘The principle of inadmissibility of acquiring territory by force has become part of
general international law, endowed with the character of a preemptory rule of international law (jus cogens). It has been confirmed in such instruments as, inter alia, the Friendly Relations Declaration of the General Assembly (GA) in 1970 and reaffirmed in a series of Security Council (SC) resolutions concerned with specific cases, including Resolution 242….’

International Law: A Dictionary, Boleslaw Boczek, p. 214.

What? You are the one saying that what I’m saying is not true, champ. PROVE ME WRONG.

One link. Thatś all it would take. I’m arguing that there is no country in the world that recognizes an Israeli claim to the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

PROVE ME WRONG:

When you signed on with BDS you made it very clear what you stand for: genocide, apartheid, murder, the annihilation of Jewish human rights, and racism. If that bothers you, tear up your BDS membership card. I didn’t ask BDS to be so awful, or for you to join it, I just tell the truth. Try it sometime.

You have a “Divest” sticker as your profile picture. You stood alongside the brownshirts of BDS, fighting their fight with them. You are culpable for their actions.

But I’m glad that you don’t deny what I say about BDS is true.

‘Civil rights is about destroying white America’–bigot like yourself, circa 1964.

Interesting link to the zio-nazi echo chamber! Ending communism in Russia did not mean the elimination of Russians. No genocide required. Ending apartheid in Israel is just the same. Ending the hateful and supremacist colonial state of Israel would be a liberation for Jews. As a Jew, I consider the Zionist ideology to be a stain on Judaism.

And none of them called for genocide, killing Jews or anything of the like.

Yes. Israel must end. Just like apartheid South Africa. Just like the USSR.

Israel is an evil. An ethnocracy based on racial privilege. It is a stain on Judaism.

Jewish liberation needs to see the back of Nazi-inspired Zionist ideology.