Site Sponsor:
Speaks Out
April 9, 1999
Should the United States be involved in Kosovo?
Why or why not? If so, in what capacity?
"I have family in Serbia and talk to them every day on e-mail.
I"m having to tell them what"s going on  they wouldn"t have
known about the refugees, for instance. The Serbian press doesn"t
give out any information. The people just know they"re getting
bombed by what their press is now calling the North American
Terrorist Organization. Yes, I do think the United States and the
international community has to be involved because the countries
directly affected can"t handle it on their own."
Eloisa Klementich
Graduate student
Latin American urban planning
"The news media makes it seem like it"s just America involved,
but it"s an international effort. And that"s what it should be; all
countries need to be involved. So, as long as it remains an
international consensus, and as long as Milosevic keeps refusing to
back down, military action is necessary."
Andrew Keefe
Graduate student
Mechanical engineering
"I think we should be involved in a limited capacity like we are
now, instead of a full-scale war. We should bring attention to
Serbia that what it"s doing is wrong. I don"t think we"ll be able
to solve the problem because that area has been at war forever
 that"s their way of life. But we still should continue
involvement to show that war and ethnic cleansing should not be a
normal way of life."
Ann Vu
Third-year
Microbiology and molecular genetics
"I feel our efforts should be maximized in Kosovo. But,
personally, I think think there are many other human rights issues
in the world that we should be involved in. It"s just that there"s
been a public outcry over Kosovo in the international community.
It"s very justified; I only wish there was more public outcry and
international involvement around the world."
Andre Munoz
Office manager
ASUCLA textbooks
"I think we should be involved. Do I think bombing is
sufficient? Probably not. But should the United States only get in
conflicts they can win or conflicts where there"s a moral
obligation to do so? I find it very difficult to stomach the United
States fighting a war in Iraq over oil and yet doing nothing when
we see a government"s wholesale slaughtering of entire ethnic
groups."
Carla Thorson
Doctoral candidate
Political science
"My question is, why isn"t the U.N. involved more instead of
just NATO? The U.N. is generally more peaceful and it"s
international, whereas NATO is just European. But I do feel that
these are necessary measures that NATO is taking against
Yugoslavia. Something has to be done before it"s too late."
Serge Hauert
Graduate student
Mechanical engineering
Comments, feedback, problems?
© 1999 ASUCLA Communications Board