In my other life outside of the offices of the Daily Bruin, I spend a lot of time at the various pools owned by UCLA.

On Monday, I was scheduled to guard a water aerobics class at the school’s rehabilitation pool in Westwood.

Imagine my surprise when, as opposed to conversations about the minutiae of their day, I overheard the people in the class talk about something a little, well, greener: pot.

A debate had started up over the merits of medical marijuana as a tool in coping with the symptoms of multiple sclerosis, a degenerative nerve condition that each person in the class had in some form or another.

One woman, Michelle Hazan, had used it and stopped because she didn’t like “the munchies.” She stopped not because weed is some evil herb, like we’re used to hearing, but because she didn’t want to gain weight.

Another woman, Homa Fani, had begun using marijuana in order to curb the pain she experienced on a daily basis. She had been hesitant to start using marijuana because she wanted to be a good role model for her kids – until her kids grew up and convinced her to try it.

Given the fact that these individuals are old enough to have seen Richard Nixon start the “war on drugs” and the anti-drug hysteria that followed, I was both surprised and encouraged to hear most of them had changed their stances when faced with new facts and personal experience.

This is relatively representative of the country at large. Given the legalization of marijuana in Washington and Colorado, and a growing sentiment for legalization in California, the reduced stigma of marijuana has resulted in research no longer being considered taboo. In fact, according to an October Gallup poll, 58 percent of people in the United States now support the plant’s legalization.

Which is why, given its status as a world-renowned medical research institution, UCLA should lobby the federal government to allow for the formation of a team at the university dedicated to understanding the hard science of marijuana’s effects on the body.

The University of California Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, housed at UC San Diego, has been conducting research about marijuana’s potential medical impact on multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries and AIDS, but further spreading the effort to more campuses would inject multiple scientific perspectives into the research effort.

While the progressive viewpoint of the people I talked to was encouraging, most of them expressed a desire to understand exactly how the drug works on the body.

For example, some of the attendees were concerned about the addictiveness of the drug – according to the magazine Psychology Today, about 9 percent of regular users become seriously addicted – and the adverse health effects of the smoke.

The research is in its infancy, and with the movement toward legalization gaining more legitimacy, it benefits everyone to understand the costs and benefits of marijuana use.

There are hurdles, obviously, such as the cost and feasibility of expanding marijuana research.

There seems to be money available. The National Institute on Drug Abuse recently granted the University of Michigan $2.2 million in new research funding to explore the science behind medical marijuana, despite its status as a Schedule I controlled substance.

In addition, UCLA currently does have a medical marijuana research team, funded by federal money, but the research is focused primarily on the sociological effects of dispensaries on local communities.

As for the feasibility and necessity of this research, the facts speak for themselves.Legally, only 134 medical marijuana dispensaries are allowed to operate within Los Angeles’ borders.However, the Los Angeles Times conservatively estimated at a certain point that there were more than 800 additional shops operating illegally.

That means there are enough people in the market for marijuana and also a large supply of diverse individuals that can be used for test trials.

Adding to the growing momentum behind moderate recreational use and the relatively small amount of scientific information available, it would serve as a huge boon to the community to have a prestigious local institution involved that could better inform people about the consequences of their actions.

It’s evident that weed is here to stay.

Instead of asking what we can do to prevent that reality, it’s more important now to accept the shifting status quo and look toward ways to better inform users about the potential effects of the drug on their bodies.

Published by Ryan Nelson

Ryan Nelson was the Opinion editor from 2015-16 and a member of the Bruin Editorial Board from 2013-16. He was an opinion columnist from 2012-14 and assistant opinion editor in 2015. Alongside other Bruin reporters, Nelson covered undocumented students for the Bridget O'Brien Scholarship Foundation. He also writes about labor issues, healthcare and the environment.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *