It’s been done before ““ that is, setting the work of Walt Whitman to music ““ but the Dream Brothers, UCLA Extension professors Stephan David Hewitt and Gary Glickman, thought there was always something missing.
Glickman and David Hewitt find the many attempts tended to be over-intellectualized, misrepresenting the democratic nature of Whitman’s poetry.
“I had heard various composers’ settings of his songs over the years, but they were very intellectual and stuffy, and not sexy at all. The poems are really sexy,” Glickman said.
Whitman’s ideology of love, acceptance and the need to sing the body eclectic are to be recast into song as the two premiere their new album “Full of Life Now: The Love Songs of Walt Whitman,” accompanied by their five-piece ensemble tonight at the Northwest Campus Auditorium sponsored by the UCLA LGBT Campus Resource Center.
As Ezra Pound wrote, it was Whitman who “broke the new wood” of the strict poetic line, creating an egalitarian form to match the meaning of his poetry, his meter and intentional lack-thereof.
In their presentation of Whitman’s 1855 set of poems “Leaves of Grass” ““ which the poet proclaimed to be the new American epic ““ Glickman and David Hewitt have taken care to preserve this freedom, sexuality and everyman quality in order to faithfully realize the poet’s intention, as well as to enable their music to appeal to a broader audience.
“I think UCLA is the perfect audience for this music. It’s kind of a new genre of music, because the poems dictate the way the music is written. It’s somewhat pop, somewhat classical ““ just like the poetry,” David Hewitt said.
The “sexiness” of Whitman’s poetry, especially in the case of the “Calamus” poems, was an early and continuing cause of shock and condemnation toward the work as being overtly vulgar, even homoerotic. However, while it may have been too bold to ask an 1850s audience to accept a poem titled “We Two Boys Together Clinging,” almost 150 years later the public can unpack and embrace the meaning of Whitman’s gender-blind affection that appreciates sexuality as a divine extension of the human body.
“What I love about Whitman is that he combines the sexual and spiritual and coins them as one thing, that all life is sacred in all forms,” David Hewitt said.
What today may be considered an enlightened sensibility once garnered Whitman simple and crude categorizations as homosexual, bisexual, even hypersexual.
Both David Hewitt and Glickman view Whitman’s love as being essentially human and therefore transcending such categories, categories that even our 21st century attitudes of acceptance fall short of.
“He really loved women and loved men. In our culture, which is so fragmented and compartmentalized, if you’re one thing you can’t be another thing. All the liberation ideologies have been very important, but the downside is that they’ve separated us all,” Glickman said.
Whitman’s radical message of love for self and stranger alike is as important politically now as it was when he composed “Leaves of Grass” on the eve of the Civil War.
Beyond acceptance and love, issues of race and religion also permeate Whitman’s work.
“This time filled with war and so much hatred is exactly the time Whitman was writing for. In a time with so much hatred, it’s important to say that the people we are so quick to hate are our brothers and sisters and lovers,” Glickman said.
Glickman and David Hewitt acutely feel the timeliness of their work, not only to our political landscape, but also for the college-aged community, which so fervently seeks what Whitman’s wisdom has to offer.
“Really the soul’s journey is the essential one. If people starting out knew that, if I knew that in my 20s, I could have saved so much energy plundering around through knowledge and facts and intellect,” David Hewitt said.
They produced this album not just for the sake of poetry but with the hope that it would impact others.
“One of the reasons that we’re really excited about this performance, way beyond ambition or personal stuff, is the chance to share this incredible work with young people who are just starting out,” Glickman said.
The two absolutely feel their appropriation of Whitman’s words to be not only necessary to present them to a new audience, but that their efforts would be to Whitman’s approval.
“We asked ourselves, “˜Would (Whitman) be cool with this?'” Glickman said.
They hope that, by putting Whitman’s words into a new form, they can be appreciated in new ways.
“That’s essential too; we didn’t write this stuff to aggrandize ourselves or to make ourselves geniuses,” David Hewitt said.
“We really wanted to get his poetry out there in as pure a form as we can and to set it in music that people can hear today, and I think we accomplished that.”